UC-NRLF p. The Old Wives' Tale A Play by- GEORGE PEELE As presented at Middlebury College in 1911 Edited with Notes and an Introduction BY FRANK W. CADY, A.M., B.Litt. (Oxon) ARTletVeRJTAni BOSTON: RICHARD G. BADGER TORONTO: THE COPP, CLARK CO., LIMITED Introduction and Stage Directions Copyright, 1916, by Richard G. Badger All Rights Reserved - 73y \°(\Q> Made in the United States of America The Gorham Press, Boston, U. S. A. INTRODUCTION Of the plays of George Peele, The Old Wives' Tale was long in least repute. Critics looked at it askance because they failed to realize its purpose, and so felt it to be a jumble of all sorts of things of little virtue and less interest. The critic is at home with the conventional, and this play is in some respects unconventional. It was not to be subjected to the usual standards of judgment, and so the critic passed it over, after expressing mild surprise that Milton should have honored so feeble a thing by making it the source of the story told in Com us. And yet the chief devices used in con- structing the Tale are strikingly conventional; it is only in sources and purpose that Peele shows his originality. The thing which distinguishes Elizabethan drama from other dramatic types is the control of the story by the characters. In classic drama once the story is decided upon the characters and their places in it are fixed. Not so in Elizabethan. It had, strictly speaking, no story unity. The major story of the plot was hardly more than a starting point in getting together a group of characters typical in a general way of the society of the times and form- ing the center of unity around which action, spec- 3 300 4 . ... INTRODUCTION tacle, and dialogue were grouped. Of uch a play the Merchant of Venice is a typical example. The major story is the story of Portia and Bassanio. To it naturally is added Antonio's experience with Shylock. But Shylock has a daughter and she a lover, and Tubal is Shylock's closest friend, and Portia has other suitors besides Bassanio, and Launcelot Gobbo has some uncertainty whom he shall serve. So it goes, here a little and there a little added to the original story, until at the end we have before us a group of people varied and yet homogeneous, each with his own life story inter- woven inextricably with those of the others. The unity, however, is found in the homogeneous group of characters and not in the diverse stories of their lives. It is in the characters, also, that the realism of The Merchant of Venice shows itself. They it is that give the atmosphere of plausibility to a most improbable series of events. Stage tradition, in- herited from medieval times, took no thought of temporal or spatial perspective. The people in The Merchant of Venice are English men and women transported to Venice for the story's sake. The story is extravagant and absurd. It is ac- cepted without question because the people whose it is are real and intensely alive. The great secret of Shakespeare's skill in character portrayal was his genius; but the traditional habit of his theater to make characters English and realistic and to subordinate story to the presentation of a homoge- INTRODUCTION 5 neous socid group gave him his magnificent oppor- tunity. He came in the fullness of time. It is true, however, that by the time Shakespeare wrote his comedies there was ready for him a story formula which had been found especially effective in the presentation of this homogeneous character group. To it he added, certainly, but he did not alter it materially, because his interest was primar- ilv in the group of characters and the story was scarcely more than a vehicle of expression. In fol- lowing this formula he made up his plot from two or three stories. There was a story dealing with people of the better class. As was normal in his day it was from the point of view of these people that the social group was handled. Beside this ran another story about characters whose social rank was low, tradesmen, or servants, or social outcasts. The chief story was always borrowed. The minor story might be borrowed or original. But it always seems to grow out of an attempt to give social orientation to the people in the main story through an enlargement of the background of their life by an original treatment of the minor characters in the story. Often by the sheer force of its originality and consequent realism it usurped the interest of the main story and ran away with the play. However that might be, the action of these stories was always skillfully interrelated by the use of character or situation in precisely the same way that the life stories of any homogeneous 6 INTRODUCTION group of men and women would be related. Often, indeed, Shakespeare invented a third story, or group of episodes, to bind the other two together, as in Midsummer-night's Dream, where the fairies are so used, or the Jessica-Lorenzo episodes in The Merchant of Venice, or Dogberry and the Watch in Much Ado. But the total effect was to give the impression of a cross-section of Elizabethan so- ciety, each group intent upon its own purposes, but in accomplishing them plausibly assisting the pur- poses of the other groups. The unity lay not in the story, but in the homogeneity of the group of characters. This is not the place to discuss further Shakespeare's artistic skill in presenting this homo- geneous group. The point here to be made is that Peele, with a skill not equaling Shakespeare's, is using the same formula. It is in this respect that the play is a forerunner of greater things. The play is a fairy story. In order to got his audience into the mood he desires, Peele m&kes use of that perfectly conventional Elizabethan device, j-frr jndiirtinn, In it Madge begins to tell the fairy tale, when the actors themselves break in upon the scene and the action is at once under way, like a dream come true. Madge in the induction and throughout the play performs a necessary and im- portant service in making Peele's purpose plain and in keeping it before the audience; but at the start she is well content to see others enact her Story for her. When it is well under way it is INTRODUCTION 7 seen to consist of aj_ least t\vo_slojjci._ Each of these centers about a double quest. In the main story two brothers are searching for their sister who has been spirited away by a sorcerer. The other part of the double quest in this main story is taken up by a lover of the sister who comes seeking her. In the minor story two crude fellows aping the chivalry of their betters enter uporT~a quest for one whom we are allowed to believe is the same young woman ; but they are satisfied each with one of the two daughters jpf LampjjJscus, a villager, whose quest for husbands for his daugh- ters is the second part of the minor story. All of these quests are bound together by the presence in the plot of the story of Erestus, who is the prophet of good, and foretells to each seeker what he may hope from his quest. Erestus himself is under the power of the sorcerer in the play who has stolen {his lady and driven her mad. Here we have the story of those in higher walks of life and that of those in the lower interrelated in many ways and bound together by a third story acting as a cement between the other two. In this respect it does not differ from the practice of Shakespeare himself. Peele is, however, much more skillful in his use of the induction than in his use of the formuFa for romantic comedy. In fact, without the induction the story would hardly hang together, because the group of characters does not have quite the homo- geneity Shakespeare succeeded in imparting to his 8 INTRODUCTION groups, and without which it is difficult to give a romantic comedy the impression of unity. And yet the matter of the story is but a fairy tale, and Madge so successfully introduced its outline into her induction that she has given itr^n_iropxession of unity it otherwise would not have. It is perfectly true, one must confess, that these two major conventionalities would of themselves give The Old Wives' Tale no more than a historic interest were it not for two matters in which Peele showed more originality. In the first place, his choice of sources for the situations in the play was entirely original. Instead of turning to the con- ventional sources in the romantic literature and drama of the time, Peele went to the fairvjore of his_jawn laad-,- the romance of the folk, and put into his play the versions of familiar tales which he had himself without doubt heard in childhood. In the second place, by the use he makes of the induction, he not only emphasizes in the minds of the audience the sources of the play, but reminds them that the outlook upon life which he wishes them to take in viewing it is not that of the court and its sophistica- | tion, but that of people like Madge and her com- panions. Not alone original in his sources, he was also original in the point of view from which he got his outlook upon life in the play. Bound up in the conventional formula for ro- mantic comedy as used by Shakespeare there was the conventional point of view characteristic of the INTRODUCTION 9 times. Society did not center, as it does to-day, in the ubiquitous working-man. Elizabethan society existed for the upper classes. For this reason the audience was asked by the playwright of the time to identify itself in sympathetic point of view with the characters who take part in the central roman- tic story of the play. In Midsummer-night's Dream, for instance, we see everything from the viewpoint of the lovers and their set. That the crew of Bot- tom are thus seen is evident from the last act. Bot- tom is funny to the spectators, but to himself he is profoundly serious. How definitely the point of view of the play is that of the upper classes is ap- parent when one attempts to imagine the events from Bottom's viewpoint. A play viewing lffe from that angle would, it might be said, be possi- ble only in this modern day. These plays were written at a time when society had not become self-conscious and before sociology had cast its sombre shadow across men's lives. So it is that Peele dared to do the unconven^ tional and original thing when he asked his audi-! ence to identify itself for this play with Madge and, her companions and not with the lost maiden and* those in quest of her; to sit, that is, once more around the fireplace as they had done in their far- distant childhood, and see again through the narra- tive of an old and withered crone, as once they had, the romances of fairy-land unfolded before them. In its final effect Peele has asked us to look IO INTRODUCTION h again at the world from the point of view of the child, as Barrie has done for this age in Peter Pan. And in making this request he has revealed his purpose in the play. The spectator's mind is im- mediately divided against itself. The judgment of the child in him is made severely critical of the sophistication of the adult and, in this way, a dou- ble criticism of contrast is, as it were, set into action concerning the matters treated within the play.